Better Soil, Better Climate
Through no-till and cover-crop practices, the soil health management system an Ohio farmer practices restore and re-carbonize soil. The no-till practices increase crop yields by 36-44%, sequesters around 960 kg of carbon per hectare per year, and reduce fertilizer and herbicide use by 75 percent.
Approach
This project implemented a comprehensive grassland conservation and restoration restoration approach, combining scientific research with community engagement and traditional ecological knowledge.
Implementation Steps
- Baseline assessment and site selection
- Stakeholder consultation and community engagement
- Design and planning phase with technical experts
- Implementation with local workforce training
- Monitoring and adaptive management
Timeline
The project was implemented over a 2-year period, with ongoing monitoring and maintenance continuing beyond the initial implementation phase.
Environmental Benefits
- Significant increase in native species populations
- Improved water quality and regulation
- Enhanced carbon sequestration capacity
- Reduced soil erosion and improved soil health
Social & Economic Benefits
- Created local employment opportunities
- Improved community resilience to climate impacts
- Enhanced ecosystem services valued at $5M annually
- Strengthened traditional knowledge and practices
✓ What Worked Well
- Early and continuous community engagement ensured local buy-in
- Adaptive management approach allowed for course corrections
- Integration of traditional and scientific knowledge enhanced outcomes
- Multi-stakeholder partnerships provided diverse expertise and resources
⚠ Challenges Encountered
- Initial funding delays affected project timeline
- Extreme weather events required adaptive strategies
- Coordination across multiple agencies was time-intensive
- Some species recovery took longer than initially projected
→ Recommendations for Replication
- Invest adequate time in baseline assessments and planning
- Build strong local partnerships from the project outset
- Ensure long-term funding commitments for monitoring
- Document and share learnings throughout implementation
- Plan for climate adaptation from the beginning
Help spread knowledge about nature-based solutions
Copyright Notice
© 2026 Original Authors. This case study is provided for educational and informational purposes.
Contact Information
For inquiries about this case study or collaboration opportunities:
Citation
When citing this case study, please reference: Original Authors (2026).Better Soil, Better Climate. Source: https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/nature-based-solutions-roadmap/case-study-search
Related Case Studies
Arizona
The Southeast Arizona Collaborative Grassland Workgroup was created in 2010 to develop a southeastern Arizona Regional Pronghorn Strategy to increase pronghorn population numbers, distribution, and connectedness. The project aimed to improve habitat connectivity and access to available water sources through strategic fence modifications, and improve habitat quality through grassland restoration and addition of water sources.
Read MoreArizona
For over ten years, the Tucson Audubon Society has collaborated with Audubon Southwest through the Important Bird Area (IBA) program to develop a protocol that protects the Chestnut-collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus; CCLO). They monitored the CCLO population through volunteer-led in-person surveys and audio recordings, analyzed the conditions of cattle tanks, and documented the presence of invasive Lehmann’s lovegrass.
Read MoreNew Mexico
The use of organic amendments such as compost is a potential tool for grassland restoration. Compost additions can promote soil water retention and plant productivity, and reduce erosion. Cost is a major barrier to this technique. This study worked to understand and quantify the ecological benefits of compost addition, in the hopes of promoting its economic viability as a restoration method.
Read More